Re: hast vs ggate+gmirror sychrnoisation speed

On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:06:49 +0200 Mikolaj Golub wrote:

 MG> On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:01:00 +0100 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:

 PJD>> I like your patch and I agree of course it is better to send keepalive
 PJD>> packets only when connection is idle. The only thing I'd change is to
 PJD>> modify QUEUE_TAKE1() macro to take additional argument 'timeout' - if we
 PJD>> don't want it to time out, we pass 0. Could you modify your patch?

 MG> Sure :-). Could you look at the updated version?

 MG> Note. So far I have only tested that hastd with this updated patch is
 MG> compilable and runnable. I will do normal testing today later when I have
 MG> access to my test instances and will report about the results.

Tested. It works for me.

-- 
Mikolaj Golub
_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"