On 3/11/2014 3:30 PM, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Hmmm.. ok, that worked, which implies there's a problem in the ipfw code
> -- does the pf patch address ipfw as well?
I think the patch is pf specific. I dont use ipfw in a stateful way.
Perhaps its just an issue of increase its equiv of the state table ? Not
sure. Maybe post a sanitized version of your ruleset here to start
---Mike
--
-------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"