On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:04-0700, Chris H wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a couple of uncritical systems running stable/8 r258344.
> > Hardware is Dell OptiPlex GX260, BIOS A09, which is the latest rev.
> >
> > The r264339 GENERIC kernel are unable to mount the root fs from the
> > hard drive using MBR, FreeBSD slice, and UFS volume labels.
> =
> You didn't indicate where it won't mount the drives from. Is this from
> the releng_8 install media. In other words, When booting the install
> media, the installer can't find the drive(s)? Or is it something else?
> When you're presented with the problem, what's the output of ls /dev
> do any of ad0* da0* show up? If so, what's the output from
> gpart list ad0s1 and the likes?
It's when the kernel attempts to mount the root fs from the hard =
drive during startup.
Booting the old kernel, r258344 from November 19th, 2013, works as =
expected.
Typing ? at the mountroot> prompt presented by the new and faulty =
kernel reveals acd0 and ad0 as GEOM managed disk devices. The kernel =
printed a few lines or so above the mountroot> prompt that it =
perfectly detected the ad0 harddrive.
The latest kernel simply can't find /dev/ufs/root nor /dev/ad0s1a.
Here's the output from various commands:
trond@amanda:~>uname -a
FreeBSD amanda.[withheld] 8.4-STABLE FreeBSD 8.4-STABLE #0 r258344: Tue Nov=
19 21:33:39 CET 2013 root@amanda.[withheld]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AMAND=
A i386
trond@amanda:~>gpart show ad0
=3D> 63 976773105 ad0 MBR (465G)
63 976773105 1 freebsd [active] (465G)
trond@amanda:~>bsdlabel ad0s1
# /dev/ad0s1:
8 partitions:
# size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
a: 2097152 0 4.2BSD 0 0 0
b: 4194304 2097152 swap
c: 976773105 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't=
edit
d: 2097152 6291456 4.2BSD 0 0 0
e: 8388608 8388608 4.2BSD 0 0 0
f: 4194304 16777216 4.2BSD 0 0 0
g: 41943040 20971520 4.2BSD 0 0 0
h: 913858545 62914560 4.2BSD 0 0 0
trond@amanda:~>df -ah
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ufs/root 989M 215M 694M 24% /
devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev
/dev/ufs/home 3.9G 694M 2.9G 19% /home
/dev/ufs/tmp 989M 7.1M 903M 1% /tmp
/dev/ufs/usr 19G 8.2G 9.7G 46% /usr
/dev/ufs/var 2G 326M 1.5G 18% /var
/dev/ufs/amandahd0 422G 6.0k 422G 0% /var/spool/amanda/hd0
procfs 4.0k 4.0k 0B 100% /proc
linprocfs 4.0k 4.0k 0B 100% /usr/compat/linux/proc
linsysfs 4.0k 4.0k 0B 100% /usr/compat/linux/sys
The results are the same on the spare system.
There I first wiped the harddrive clean, by booting from the =
8.0-RELEASE dvd1, ran dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3D/dev/ad0 bs=3D128M, before I =
installed 8.0-RELEASE. I then transferred an up-to-date working copy =
of stable/8 to the spare system. Next, I compiled world and the =
GENERIC kernel, without any hassle. I performed make installkernel and =
rebooted.
The boot loader managed its way through the maze, read /etc/fstab and =
found the entry for the root filesystem. The new GENERIC kernel, =
however, simply can't understand what to do with:
vfs.root.mountfrom=3D"ufs:/dev/ufs/root"
vfs.root.mountfrom.options=3D"rw"
as presented by the boot loader. Mind you, the boot loader hasn't been =
replaced yet. Maybe that's the whole issue, however weird it sounds.
/boot/loader.conf is empty btw.
I'm doing a similar attempt in VirtualBox at home as I write this.
There I began with 8.4-RELEASE, and are currently compiling stable/8 =
r264351.
I'll later try in VBox, 8.4-R -> stable/8 with GPT + UFS, using GPT =
labels, just to rule out UFS labels.
> > r258344 obviously can.
> >
> > I even tried regular device names like /dev/ad0s1a in /etc/fstab, and
> > at the mountroot> prompt, i.e. ufs:/dev/ad0s1a. The kernel still
> > cannot mount the root fs.
> >
> > The new kernel (r264339) does recognize the ad0 harddrive, and ad0 is
> > listed as one of the GEOM managed disk devices; acd0 being the other
> > one.
> >
> > Do I need to load additional geom modules, or is it a genuine bug?
> >
> > I have recreated the same conditions on a spare GX260, yes, I have
> > plenty of them.
> >
> > In addition there was some problems with the USB subsystem, so I
> > disabled USB in the BIOS for now. USB is not essential for any of my
> > systems.
> >
> > Maybe it's time to leave stable/8 and enter stable/10 or stable/9.
> > I'll try to compile stable/9 on the spare system, and see how it
> > fares.
> >
> > Any thoughts regarding the problem mounting the root fs?
-- =
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, |
| Trond Endrest=F8l, | Trond Endrest=F8l, |
| IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, |
| Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gj=F8vik Technical College, Norway, |
| tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, |
| sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. |
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"