看板 FB_stable 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:53-0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Trond Endrest=F8l wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 23:09-0600, Warren Block wrote: > > > = > > > My first guess would be missing bootcode in the BSDlabel slice. But = I may > > > have missed that when I missed earlier parts of this thread. > > = > > How? Why? The system has booted FreeBSD stable/8 for the last five > > years using MBR, slice, and UFS labels. Why should it stop all of a > > sudden? > = > Accidental overwrite or (long shot) disk sector failure? I don't know, > really. Check the smartctl output for that disk. The BSDlabel bootcode = can > be reinstalled without harming the filesystems. I'd still make a backup > first, something questionable is going on. > = > Inclusion of the geom_raid kernel module for the first time, and old RAID > metadata on the disk? That would show in /var/log/messages or dmesg. If > that's the problem, it can be disabled in loader.conf or at a boot prompt= with > kern.geom.raid.enable=3D0. I wouldn't rule out anything yet, but the spare system has a fairly = recent and hardly used harddrive, dated 2010 on the sticker, an WDC = WD5000AAKB-00H8A0. Incidently, this is the same kind of drive as I = have in the amanda box. :-/ On Saturday, I installed 8.0-RELEASE on the spare system using the = standard menu option, which results in MBR and slice. I overrode the = newfs options by adding -L volumename to each fs. Before rebooting I = edited /etc/fstab to use the UFS labels found in /dev/ufs instead of = the usual device names. It turns out this arrangement is readable by 8.4-RELEASE dvd1 and also = by the stable/9 snapshot marked 20140405 r264148. I wiped the drive = clean and installed 8.4-RELEASE the same way as I did with 8.0-R. This = arrangement is readable by 8.0-RELEASE dvd1 and by the stable/9 = snapshot. Something must have happened in stable/8 between r258344 and r264339. = Today's plan is to rewind the working copy of stable/8 on the spare = back to r258344 and confirm that the UFS labels are accepted by the = kernel of that revision. If all goes well, I'll move forward one = revision at a time until I reach the revision where it all breaks. I haven't checked the disklabels with any recent stable/10 snapshot, = so I might do that as well. Thanks for all your input. I'll keep you posted. -- = +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrest=F8l, | Trond Endrest=F8l, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gj=F8vik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"