看板 FB_stable 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On Thursday, May 01, 2014 1:55:41 am Don Lewis wrote: > On 30 Apr, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Are you up for doing some printf sleuthing? There are two odd things that I > > see so far: > > > > 1) the base address of 0. The question here is if pci_add_map() in > > sys/dev/pci/pci.c decides to set start to 0 explicitly, or if it happens > > further up the callchain (should be bus_alloc_resource calls in > > sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pcib_acpi.c, sys/x86/x86/nexus.c and then in the > > rman code itself in sys/kern/subr_rman.c) > > > > 2) The 'reserved' printfs during boot probe. Those come from a printf in > > pci_alloc_resource() in sys/dev/pci/pci.c. However, that should not be called > > until a driver attaches to a device and calls bus_alloc_resource(). It should > > not be called from pci_add_child() as it seems to be now. > > The call graph for the four earlier ones that you previously pointed > out (not hostb0) is: > pci_add_child() > pci_add_resources() > *_early_takeover() > [I suspect] > bus_alloc_resource_any() > pci_alloc_resource() > > These are the three system uhci controllers and the system ehci > controller, which apparently pass this test: > pci_get_class(dev) == PCIC_SERIALBUS && > pci_get_subclass(dev) == PCIS_SERIALBUS_USB Oh, ok. That is fine, and that explains why it was selective in the past (and only for I/O resources). That just leaves 1) then. It would be especially good to know what pci_add_map() does when it sees this BAR during the bus probe. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"