看板 FB_stable 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On 5/20/2014 3:09 AM, Lucius Rizzo wrote: > I have been looking into articles comparing firewalls that come with > FreeBSD. There isn't much recent info on the net. I am currently using > FreeBSD 10 with IPFilter. It depends. I will use ipfw or pf depending on the app. But I never use ipfilter as there is really no one maintaining it in FreeBSD. Also, if you are using RELENG_10, using pf can better take advantage of multiple cores. For stateful firewalls, pf is the way to go for me. The rules are easy to manage in a simple text configuration file which makes it easier to maintain across reboots. ipfw is good (for me) where speed is important, and very few rules are needed. Also, if you want to do traffic shaping, dummynet+ipfw works well. The traffic shaping solutions for pf are not so good right now. ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"