Re: Not to beat a dead horse, but ...

Hi,

On 9 Jun 2014, at 4:58, Andreas Nilsson <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:15 PM, George Mitchell <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> =

>> [ =85 ]
>> The party line seems to be, "Well, everybody knows SCHED_ULE sucks
>> on uniprocessors."  Hello?  Not everybody has upgraded to multiple
>> core or hyperthreaded processors yet.  Do we really want to write
>> off every uniprocessor piece of hardware out here?
>> =

> Yes? Can you even buy a system today that is uniprocessor? My phone is a
> dual core thing, and it got written of because of its "meagre" hardware.
> Top of the line phones has 8 cores. So, seriously, what non-ancient system
> have you acquired that is uniprocessor? Please include links for available
> hardware for laptops, desktops or servers.
> /A

Embedded systems. There are lots of them. Your phone is pretty close to a g=
eneral purpose computer now and has to do a lot of stuff, including being a=
 gaming device. Lots of workloads fit into smaller systems. See:

http://www.soekris.com/
http://www.advantech.com/
http://www.pcengines.ch/
http://www.chippc.com/

Those are just the Intel based ones - for ARM and MIPS there is a very long=
 list (we don=92t run FreeBSD on those yet, but we are planning to.)

Regards,

Jan.

_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"