--Z6fAQKPsmSJwidi3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:31:36AM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Konstantin Belousov
> <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Gcc promise is that libstdc++ is backward binary compatible, and
> > base system build of libstdc++ aimed to be compatible with libstdc++
> > from the same standalone gcc version.
> >
> > I am not sure where libstdc++.so.7, used by your binary, gets it origin.
> > Might be, ask whoever did the build ?
>=20
> arcconf is a utility for managing Adaptec RAID controller. It's
> compiled by Adaptec and they distribute it as a binary.
My point is, the libstdc++.so.7 is not shipped by FreeBSD base, nor it
is provided by gcc builds. If somebody bumped the so version, it was done
for a reason. If ABI is not changed, why bumping the version ?
In other words, Adaptec should be asked for the library.
--Z6fAQKPsmSJwidi3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=dxeV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Z6fAQKPsmSJwidi3--