看板 FB_stable 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> wrote: > Without knowing the exact cabling arrangement, have you considered buying a > small switch that understands vlan? Then you could do some trickery with > that to have your server elsewhere (with just one ethernet cable)? Networking is not really my thing, so I'm going to read up some more on that - it sounds promising. I've probably got my thinking wrong on this, but would the result of putting lan and wan traffic down a single cable limit the upload and download to a cumulative 1 Gbit/s from a LAN client's viewpoint? > We haven't done any testing of the different NAT solutions available so I > can't give any specific numbers there. But I don't think it will help > throughput, especially old school natd in userspace. > > A colleague of mine also has 1Gbit/s home, and he hade to tweak the settings > and buy a decent intel card to get 900+Mbit/s on his old dell entry level > desktop. I would use pf to do the nat; it's what I used with ADSL - perhaps that is even slower, but fine for 8 Mbit. I've got plenty of cheap intel (em) cards, they've worked quite well as clients so far without any tuning on 10. I don't use torrents or things like that, but do download large files from time to time. The quickest I've clocked one of them downloaded is 87 MB/s, which I guess is roughly 700 Mbit/s, but I've no idea of the overheads. Certainly with iperf between each BSD machine on the LAN I can get a reading of 900+ Mbit/s. Cheers Tom _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"