看板 FB_stable 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On 18/06/2014 9:32 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:17:05PM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: >> While migrating from 9.2 Stable (9.3Beta3) to 10.0Stable (r267307M) I >> noticed that some of the sysctl's that I adjust for tuning purposes >> aren't writeable, instead sysctl returns an "Invalid argument". The two >> sysctl's of interest are: >> net.flowtable.maxflows and kern.ipc.maxsockets >> >> Would someone advise the new way that these can be adjusted to suite the >> purpose of the servers? There was no mention in src/UPDATING. >> > EINVAL most likely comes from sysctl handler for given variable if it is unhappy > with new value. > > net.flowtable.maxflows's will complain if you are trying to shrink it. > > kern.ipc.maxsockets's will complain if the following does not hold: > if (newmaxsockets > maxsockets && > newmaxsockets <= maxfiles) { > > > maxfiles can be read from kern.maxfiles > Thanks for providing feedback and advice. Mateusz, You've given me a clue and yes, I probably need to read the code first; I had maxsockets=maxfiles+8. The default for this 10.0 Stable amd64 machine, with 8GB and kern.maxusers="512" # sysctl -ae | egrep "maxsockets|maxfiles=" kern.maxfiles=254868 kern.ipc.maxsockets=254870 Rolf, good suggestion. Though its probably better to check, in my case sysctl -Ta|egrep "maxsockets|maxflows" # Checks for variables set within loader.conf sysctl -Wa | egrep "maxsockets|maxflows" # Checks for variables set via sysctl.conf (or sysctl). These particular variables are writeable via sysctl. And frankly, I'm pleased that sysctl did perform a sanity check and rejected my numbers, something that I'll need to investigate further. :) Kind regards, Dewayne. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"