--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 06 Jul 2014, 23:47 +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
> John has a T43 thinkpad, with unstated graphics hardware; intel 915 or=20
> Radeon X300 according to thinkwiki?
For the record, Intel 915GM. I included full details a few days ago in
my as-yet-unanswered post to -x11@. Troubleshooting my X failure wasn't
the purpose of my post to -stable@; but it's sounding like the answer is
probably "pre-2009 hardware unsupported by the 9.3 default NEW_XORG".
> It seems that if you upgrade from 9.1 or 9.2 you will need to manually=20
> intervene, either way
In my case (short story for a user with older hardware):
- leaving make.conf as is lands me in X trouble
- adding WITHOUT_NEW_XORG to make.conf keeps things working as for 9.2
> Seeing that a perhaps not miniscule proportion of 9.x X users will need=
=20
> to do some manual configuration on upgrading to 9.3, a relevant WARNING=
=20
> in http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.3R/relnotes.html should be helpful.
Definitely.
Highlighting the fact that the 9.3 introduces a default NEW_XORG ports
build, pointing out implications for folks with "older" hardware and
the availability of the WITHOUT_NEW_XORG knob would, I think, be
helpful. The ports infrastructure controls the logic for the NEW_XORG
build decision but I think the fact that the result of that decision for
9.3-RELEASE is OPPOSITE to what it is for 9.2-RELEASE, and that building
(now-default) NEW_XORG for folks with older hardware WILL break X for
them, warrants a note in the 9.3 release documentation.
--=20
John Marshall
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlO6bEUACgkQw/tAaKKahKIjfwCgsEAs4jClVd9IdVwZIe11Kcaw
n5QAniOLuwDEF+Cz04pBF+EcViCZ1h3N
=KYOl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--