This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigC40763EF778E2CD6C77B80B8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bez=FCglich Jan Mikkelsen's Nachricht vom 24.06.2014 04:49 (localtime):
> Hi,
>=20
> I=92m bringing 9.3-RC1 into our local Perforce depot and moving our loc=
al patches to 9.2 forward.
>=20
> I noticed that r256920 (changing sys/netinet/tcp_input.c) has not been =
MFC=92d. It was listed as =93MFC after 3 days=94 back in October 2013.
>=20
> Is this patch missing for a reason?
I'm wondering too if there's any good reason not to MFC?
Thanks,
-Harry
--------------enigC40763EF778E2CD6C77B80B8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAlO6hmYACgkQLDqVQ9VXb8jA/wCgoGk54m2vhz1uu9503Ktg5zYD
qd0An3zRZSw/tNCQ8NLT34K7mvlaVnKa
=fqkH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enigC40763EF778E2CD6C77B80B8--