看板 FB_stable 關於我們 聯絡資訊
[-stable to bcc; keeping -current] On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 07/05/14 15:10, David Chisnall wrote: >> On 5 Jul 2014, at 14:07, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> >>> Interestingly, -Wno-uninitialized has been in bsd.sys.mk since r76861, >>> and the accompanying comment ("XXX Delete -Wuninitialized by default for >>> now -- the compiler doesn't always get it right") has never been >>> changed. :-) >>> >>> It is probably time to re-enable that warning after 13 years, at least. >> >> It probably only wants enabling for clang. GCC (at least, GCC 4.2.1) >> performs this analysis based on analyses run by the optimisers and so the >> warnings are dependent on optimisation level. >> >> David > > Hi, > > Is someone working on this? I was going to chime in and claim that I had seen false positives from -Wuninitialized even from recent clang, but upon consulting my build logs, it seems that the false positives are actually from -Wconditional-uninitialized. Is that known to be less reliable? -Ben _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"