看板 FB_stable 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:22:38AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk> > > > Not sure if its in stable/10 but there was some talk about making > > ZFS use lz4 for some things by default, wonder if that might have > > something to do with it? > > Another silly question is do you see the same increase on 10.0-RELEASE? Good question, not silly. The answer is I don't know -- when I moved from RELENG_9 to RELENG_10, I reinstalled straight from memstick here: ftp://ftp4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/10.0/ I always install -STABLE and not -RELEASE because for nearly 15 years I've found too many broken things in -RELEASE that don't get fixed soon enough for me. I can try "rolling back" in SVN to r256281 and try that (I'm afraid to find out what buildkernel/buildworld will break on though, heh). I think that's the rev as close to 10.0-RELEASE as possible? http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=256281 -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@koitsu.org | | UNIX Systems Administrator http://jdc.koitsu.org/ | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB | _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"