On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:22:38AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
>
> > Not sure if its in stable/10 but there was some talk about making
> > ZFS use lz4 for some things by default, wonder if that might have
> > something to do with it?
>
> Another silly question is do you see the same increase on 10.0-RELEASE?
Good question, not silly. The answer is I don't know -- when I moved
from RELENG_9 to RELENG_10, I reinstalled straight from memstick here:
ftp://ftp4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/10.0/
I always install -STABLE and not -RELEASE because for nearly 15 years
I've found too many broken things in -RELEASE that don't get fixed soon
enough for me.
I can try "rolling back" in SVN to r256281 and try that (I'm afraid to
find out what buildkernel/buildworld will break on though, heh). I
think that's the rev as close to 10.0-RELEASE as possible?
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=256281
--
| Jeremy Chadwick jdc@koitsu.org |
| UNIX Systems Administrator http://jdc.koitsu.org/ |
| Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB |
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"