On Jul 1, 2012, at 9:27 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>=20
> On Jun 30, 2012, at 11:56 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>=20
>> Author: imp
>> Date: Sun Jul 1 06:56:41 2012
>> New Revision: 237883
>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/237883
>>=20
>> Log:
>> Create a pseudo-lint kernel for all at91 SoCs. This kernel will not
>> currently boot, but will serve as a good linting. make universe =
could
>> now be altered to skip building all the other at91 kernels...
>=20
> BTW: I've implemented the LINT kernel for ARM. It combines all
> SoCs. It does have a lot of duplicate definitions, but by not
> having the linker fail on that, you get a successful build of
> something we already understand does not boot. It's good coverage
> with a single kernel and can help to bring the "make universe"
> time down by only building LINT for ARM.
I was thinking of adding NOUNIVERSE tags to the kernels that we didn't =
want routinely built. I'd rather have a single ARM kernel that can be =
built for testing purposes. Don't like the multiple defined error being =
suppressed, but short of some uglyish macros, I can't think of a better =
way. I've written those 'ugly' macros for my multi-board work, and plan =
on re-using them for the multi-soc work I intend to do to replace the =
current "selected too late" SoC support for Atmel. I was thinking we =
could expand the current set of platform/MD calls (initarm, etc), wrap =
them in some macros so they could all be compiled together. Not sure if =
you did this or not...
> I can port that to FreeBSD. Shall I make some patches for people
> to look at?
Sure. I'd love to see it. I'd be happy to preview any partial work if =
you want early feedbac.
Warner
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"