Right, that code got left in lem when i split it off from em by mistake,
just cleaning that up.
Will commit this then.
Jack
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:09 AM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:46:59 pm Jack Vogel wrote:
> > No, like so:
>
> This looks good to me. The 82574 is supported by em(4) and not lem(4) it
> seems, hence removing that?
>
> --
> John Baldwin
>
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"