作者julians (Echophilia)
看板Fiction
標題Re: [問題] aestheticism
時間Fri Apr 29 12:27:00 2005
※ 引述《redbeam (溺斃的海綿)》之銘言:
: please help me
: Aestheticism and Diabolism
: 講的主義是指對立的嗎?
: Aesthesticism => 美學主義應該是 為藝術而藝術 不該與社會文化道德有關?
: Diabolism => 真正的文學應該是跟道德 文化有關才是好的文學?
: 因為一直聽不出來老師講的到底是啥dia......在字典找到最可能的字了只是不確定
: 只知道老師在講的是跟美學主義有關的19th的主義.....請高手幫各忙
quote:
"Aestheticsim [...] was a European phenomenon during the latter 19th
century that had its chief headquarters in France. In opposition to the
dominance of scientific thinking, and in defiance of the widespread in-
difference or hostility of the middle-class society of their time to any
art that was not useful or did not teach moral values, French writers de-
veloped the view that a work of art is the supreme value among human pro-
ducts precisely becauses it is self-efficient and has no use or moral aim
outside its own being. The end [purpose] of a work of art is simply to ex-
ist in its formal perfection; that is, to be beautiful and to be contem-
plated as an end in itself. A rallying cry of Aestheticism became the phr-
ase 'l'art pour l'art'--art for art's sake" (M. H. Abrams, _A Glossary of
Literary Terms 3).
至於跟美學運動所主要反對的對象, 比較像是強調實用價值或道德教化的中產階級;
不過我覺得直得注意的是, 這些美學運動的propoent, 本身也往往都市中上階級.
你們老師說的應該是版友推文所說的didacticism;
diabolism看字根大概知道跟魔鬼有關, 我想美學運動應該容易被強調道德教訓教化
的中上階級是為魔道吧(XD...)
Didacticism"有點"像是唐朝韓愈所提倡的"文以載道";
英國文學很有名的didacticism的時期大概是18, 19th世紀;
不過說實在的, 文學作品很難只有純粹的道德實用價值(extrinsic values) or
純粹的美學價值(intrinsic value), 像Kant那種"純粹"(pure)的境界,
其實也不容易達到吧.
依照Abrams最簡單的定義, "didactic" means "intended to give instruction"
(65); 也就是說, to give instruction is to some extent to be didactic,
then how about the instruction of being aesthetic in opposition to being
useful and moral?
--
縱然陽光可以帶給人們希望
但也要心中充滿希望
才看得到陽光!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.224.53.136
推 ycjjen:謝謝julians的說明,didacticism 有哪些代表作呢? 138.88.126.194 05/01
推 julians:Richardson's _Pamela_ 61.224.55.252 05/02
推 ycjjen: 多謝! 138.88.37.86 05/03