[外媒] WSJ: Taiwan Protests Can’t Stop China

[ted5566 (ted)]

Taiwan Protests Can’t Stop China Trade

http://on.wsj.com/1fV2rwI

3:42 am ET Apr 7, 2014

新出來的文章，論學生示威無法阻擋兩岸間更緊密的貿易往來

Taiwan’s anti-trade protesters, fearful of more open commerce with China,
appear unlikely to stop stronger economic ties between the neighbors.

For three weeks, protesters have occupied Taiwan’s legislature to stop the
passage of a services trade pact between the two governments.

The protesters, led by student groups, are attempting to block a bill in the
 current parliamentary session, which runs to June. They claim the pact will
 hurt Taiwan’s small companies. Among their demands: more public involvement
 in the drafting process.

While they may delay the bill, there’s a number of reasons to believe the
two economies will move closer whether there is a pact or not.

For one, China and Taiwan’s economies already are inextricably linked. About
 a third of Taiwan’s $300 billion per year in exports go to China, largely
electronic components, petrochemicals and textiles.

Many Taiwanese firms, including Foxconn, which assembles Apple Inc.’s
iPhone, have set up factories in China to benefit from cheaper costs and a
larger domestic market.

Now, Taiwan’s banks, brokers and retailers are hoping to get better access
to China’s market through the services pact. Business groups view China’s
market as a way to boost the economy, which grew at just over 2% last year,
 hobbled by high costs and a small domestic market.

Taiwan’s many banks and brokers are fighting at home for business, and
profitability has slipped.

The pact would open up another source of revenues for securities brokers and
 fund houses by allowing them to set up majority-owned branches in central
and southern China. (Current Chinese law allows them to hold only minority
stakes.)

With closer have economic ties has come a political warming. In February,
cabinet members from both places met in the eastern Chinese city of Nanjing,
 the highest-level official meetings between the governments since 1949. (Both sides have met informally many times.)

President Ma Ying-jeou has pushed an economic détente since he took office
in 2008. The two sides passed an Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement in
 2010. After the services pact, both sides plan to discuss the full
liberalization of trade in goods.

In 2009, Mr. Ma’s government allowed Chinese companies to invest directly in
 Taiwan. Taipei has permitted its firms to invest in China since the 1990s;
last year foreign direct investment into China from Taiwan stood at $8.7
billion, up from $174 million in 1991.

Taiwanese authorities a year ago allowed its banks to accept yuan currency
deposits. The services pact would pave the way for institutions to use those
 deposits, currently at nearly 200 billion yuan, to invest in some Chinese
stocks and bond markets.

The public’s view on hugging China closer is more mixed. A recent
government-organized poll, released last week, found that 58% of respondents
 want the protesters to leave the legislature. It also found that 41% of
respondents supported the services pact, while 40% disapproved.

Some critics of the pact say it will allow bigger Taiwanese companies to
expand across the border, while small-and-medium-sized enterprises don’t
have the resources to do so and could face increased competition from
Chinese firms.

Another concern among opponents is that more investment and talent will flow
 to China, further hollowing out Taiwan’s economy. Half of Taiwan’s exports
 already are produced overseas, mostly in China.

“After years of outflows of investment and people, Taiwan doesn’t have
enough innovation to reboot the economy in order to stay competitive in a
freer trade environment,” said K.S. Lin, an economics professor at National
Taiwan University.

Others say the trend is unstoppable. “Taiwanese people will continue to
flock to the other side whether there is a trade pact or not,” said Woods
Chen, an economist from Ta Chong Bank.

Mr. Ma’s party has a majority in the Parliament, meaning the legislation is
 likely to pass eventually in some form.

There’s a lot at stake. Merrill Lynch forecasts Taiwan’s economy will grow
2.9% if the bill passes and 2.5% if it’s delayed into next year.

CLSA, a brokerage, says hopes of better economic ties, reducing Taiwan’s
dependency on the technology sector, is part of the reason Taiwanese stock
are close to three-year highs. CLSA says foreign funds bought NT$79 billion
in stock in the first quarter, while foreign investor turned net sellers of
South Korean shares in the same period.

Taiwanese assets could lose their shine if the protests linger. But for now
 Taiwan’s march toward closer ties with China doesn’t seem like stopping.

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 222.65.122.53
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/FuMouDiscuss/M.1396858171.A.417.html
推 karlrecon:沒有要阻擋往來，在意的是怎麼往來
推 slx54461:我們連現行版本都擋不了，已經輸了
→ murderice:呵呵 常看報紙的都知道華盛頓日報一貫的立場如何 不用
→ murderice:太在意
噓 Ecofair:老大！那是『華爾街日報』不是華盛頓
→ ted5566:please, neither WaPo nor washington times nor daily
噓 kiki2125:26報啦
→ murderice:呵呵 這樣都能打錯我真厲害
推 louis520:有點偏頗的報導 還用國民黨給的虛民調