[語文] GWD-26-14

[ken22154 ( 我一直都很認真)]

Q14:
In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, (arguing in a treatise
for women to have equal political and legal rights) and for changes in the
married women’s property laws.

A.   arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
B.   arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
C.   a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights
D.   a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights
E.   a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women


答案為Ｅ。

這題在寫的時候用平行解出Ｅ。

但剛剛突然想到，treatise可以argue嗎？

若treatise不能argue,則答案就可能要選Ｂ了？



所以，treatise到底可不可以argue??  物品也可以argue嗎？

希望有大師指點！

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 220.134.226.214
推 ethic:A.B不合邏輯，因為published出版的動作 不能引導argue的結果
推 ethic:argue的主詞要人或是文章
推 superlu:那請問C,D為什麼會錯?
推 weichieh:argue是主張 人或文章都可以主張
→ ken22154:to樓樓上，C,Ｄ與未畫線部分for changes不平行。
推 IhRiesling:同樓上，CD 是 Parallel 型錯誤
推 treo680:argue:to state, giving clear reasons, that s/t is true
→ treo680:,should be doneetc.