推 yhubi:1. 所謂的擴展到全州,是不分城市鄉下的,但符合禁管標準的場 06/23 23:12
→ yhubi:所在鄉下很少見, 禁令有等於沒有.所以這些人將會發現認知和 06/23 23:12
→ yhubi:實際是有落差的 06/23 23:12
→ yhubi:是讓選舉人誤解 將petition擴展到全州的 可能性 06/23 23:14
→ piwei:了解 謝謝回覆 06/27 23:52
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances, a
petition entitled "petition for statewide smoking restriction" is being
circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, " Do you want to sign a
petition for statewide smoking restriction?" The petition advocates a state
law banning in most retail establishments and in government offices that are
open to the public.
Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated
misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local
ordinances statewide.
請教一下 這題題目到底是在問什麼阿?
我的理解是何種狀況會使 認為這個請願是在extending the local ordinancs statewide
的選舉人 產生誤解 但是 產生什麼誤解阿??
答案有爭議
1In rural ares of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments
and government officesthat are open to the public.
2 The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which
contain stronger bans than the state law does.
多謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.138.169.194