推 pennymany:1930以前蓋不好的應該早就垮掉了，現在還存在的是蓋的比 10/30 16:47
→ pennymany:較好的~有錯誤請指正~~ 10/30 16:47
推 elevenC:原文說是因為1930之前的技術比較好,要weaken這個說法 10/30 17:03
→ elevenC:D.建材品質越好,就越不容易被損壞和廢棄,跟技術無關的意思 10/30 17:07
→ CGHS13:謝謝~ 10/30 17:34
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have
noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry
work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly
carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill,
care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’
s argument?
A. The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to
the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and
stores.
B. Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those
built before 1930.
C. The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not
significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters
working after 1930.
D. The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less
likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
E. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined
significantly since 1930.
ANS: D
一直看不太懂ㄋㄟ....?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.115.105