Re: [語文] CR GWD3-Q32

[sunnyE (原來改不了?)]

※ 引述《filley (我要改變...)》之銘言：
: Newspaper editorial:
: In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on
: criminals and making prison conditions harsher.  Part of this effort has been
: to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses.
:  However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal,
: since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses
: committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.
: Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
: A.      Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely
: to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
: B.      Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the
: general population.
: C.      The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not
: already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
: D.      Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s
: subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
: E.      The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing
: people that something effective is being done about crime.

這題c沒問題
A錯  =>A是說:不能上那些課的話就不可能防止那些會犯罪的人犯罪
       反過來就是:要上課才可以防止犯罪  這沒有補充到題目可能產生的弱點
C比較好  C提到這些參加課的人不是本來就在出獄後比較不會犯罪的
         這個假設成立就可以讓題目沒有漏洞
相對A只是把題目論點再說一次而已

我是這麼覺得啦

--







--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 61.229.136.166
推 Vinicks:答案感覺是(A)ㄟ...因為(A)說 要上課 才能防止犯罪...
→ Vinicks:所以是他的前提 如果上課 都不能防止犯罪的話 等於無效
→ Vinicks:所以應該建立在要上課才能防止犯罪 雖然好像有點重複內文
→ Vinicks:但是C是說 were not already less likely....
→ Vinicks:意思應該是說 不會比他們有更少的可能性的意思吧@@"?
→ Vinicks:有錯的話請大大們指教 我覺得是(A) 0.0