Re: [語文] GWD CR

[sunnyE (原來改不了?)]

※ 引述《CGHS13 (.......)》之銘言：
: The traditional treatment of step infections has been a seven-day course of
: antibiotics, either penicillin or erythromycin. However, since many patients
: stop taking those drugs within three days, reinfection is common in cases where
: these drugs are prescirbed. A new antibiotic require only a three-day course of
: treatment. Therefore, reinfection will probably be less common in cases where
: the new antibiotic is prescibed than in cases where either penicillin or
: erythromycin is prescribed.
: which of the following, if true, most strength the argument?
: A Some of people who are allergic to penicillin are likely to be allergic to
:   the antibiotic
: B A course of treatment with the new antibiotic costs about the same as a
:   course of treatment with either penicilline or erythromycin
: C The new anitibiotic has been shown to be effective in eradicating bacterial
:   infection othe than step
: D Some physicians have already begun to prescibe the new antibiotic instead of
:   penicillin or erythrimycin for the treatment of some strep infections
: E Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one,
:   most patients feel fully recovered after taking the drug for three days
: ANS: E
: why?

因為原題提到traditional療法是7天course，but病人常三天內就懶的再吃所以病復發
    但是新藥是三天course

所以選項E可以支持題目
其實舊的跟新的藥都是吃三天就好，只是病人覺得七天很煩，還沒三天就不吃了
那現在新藥只有三天的療程，病人可能就比較願意接受。(重點是他們病會好)
SO這樣的療程可能比較common

--
  喜歡跟愛是不一樣的
  喜歡是盪鞦韆
  可以自得其樂 不需要別人的回應
  愛是翹翹板
  需要一個人坐在對面與你互動
  貼近你內心的感覺...

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.67.14.140
※ 編輯: sunnyE          來自: 203.67.14.140        (11/02 10:34)
※ 編輯: sunnyE          來自: 203.67.14.140        (11/02 10:35)
→ CGHS13:TKS~~~~~^^
推 CGHS13:可以問一下D的解釋未啥不對嗎?
→ folder:想請問題目要支持的結論不是應該為是否復發狀況變得比較少
→ folder:那E選項新舊藥都一樣三天會好那復發情形不是都一樣很少嘛？
→ CGHS13:我一開始的想法跟你一樣ㄝ@@ 所以才會選D....
→ dandanny:我認同E 他題目只是推論說 不管是否新舊 可以降低就好