Re: [語文] GWD CR

[CGHS13 (.......)]

※ 引述《sunnyE (原來改不了?)》之銘言：
: ※ 引述《CGHS13 (.......)》之銘言：
: : The traditional treatment of step infections has been a seven-day course of
: : antibiotics, either penicillin or erythromycin. However, since many patients
: : stop taking those drugs within three days, reinfection is common in cases where
: : these drugs are prescirbed. A new antibiotic require only a three-day course of
: : treatment. Therefore, reinfection will probably be less common in cases where
: : the new antibiotic is prescibed than in cases where either penicillin or
: : erythromycin is prescribed.
: : which of the following, if true, most strength the argument?
: : A Some of people who are allergic to penicillin are likely to be allergic to
: :   the antibiotic
: : B A course of treatment with the new antibiotic costs about the same as a
: :   course of treatment with either penicilline or erythromycin
: : C The new anitibiotic has been shown to be effective in eradicating bacterial
: :   infection othe than step
: : D Some physicians have already begun to prescibe the new antibiotic instead of
: :   penicillin or erythrimycin for the treatment of some strep infections
: : E Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one,
: :   most patients feel fully recovered after taking the drug for three days
: : ANS: E
: : why?
: 因為原題提到traditional療法是7天course，but病人常三天內就懶的再吃所以病復發
:     但是新藥是三天course
: 所以選項E可以支持題目
: 其實舊的跟新的藥都是吃三天就好，只是病人覺得七天很煩，還沒三天就不吃了
: 那現在新藥只有三天的療程，病人可能就比較願意接受。(重點是他們病會好)
: SO這樣的療程可能比較common

想問一下

是不是因為其實多數人都在三天內好
所以 多數人選擇 只需要吃三天的新藥-病就好了 ->所以新藥的使用增加
->增加了新藥的使用 就降低了reinfection
所以可以strenghten new ->infection less 的結論?

那麼 D 有些醫生開新藥給病人吃 那不是也可以增加新藥的使用->降低reinfection ?

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 140.112.115.105
推 sunnyE:答案E是說 病人feel他們好了 實際上舊藥要七天才會好
→ sunnyE:可是新藥就沒問題了 他們覺得好的時候  就是真的好了
→ sunnyE:因為新藥是三天療程