→ folder:題目好像是問說 為什麼都排除了SULFUR污染後URBAN還是慢長 11/03 14:56
→ aaaaaakoyasu:突然開竅了...哈哈...感謝樓上...^^" 11/03 15:38
Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, and plants in
cities typically grow more slowly than do plants in rural areas. In an
experiment to see how much of the difference in growth is due to sulfur
dioxide, classes in an urban and a rural school grew plants in greenhouses at
their schools and filtered the greenhouse air to eliminate sulfur dioxide.
Plants in the urban greenhouse grew more slowly than those in the rural
greenhouse.
Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into
account in evaluating the result?
(A) The urban school was located in a part of the city in which levels of
sulfur dioxide in the air were usually far lower than is typical for urban
areas.
(B) At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly
than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouses.
(C) The urban class conducting the experiment was larger than the rural class
conducting the experiment.
(D) Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits
grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the
plants inside.
(E) Because of the higher levels of sulfur dioxide in the air at the urban
school, the air filters for the urban school's greenhouse were changed more
frequently than were those at the rural school.
答案是D
我知道BCE都錯，可是為什麼不是A...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 65.29.188.149