作者krisis (fhoa f)
看板GMAT
標題[語文] GWD-TN4-Q-20CR
時間Thu Nov 6 08:16:15 2008
GWD6-Q20:
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska
to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska's
government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000
a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is
withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five.
Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so
the government’s plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
我選b,反証它不是就是要找出不利結証的東西嗎??
為什麼是d呢???
A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least
some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term
tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace
cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts
introduced by the government.
C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in
regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income
bracket of the account holder.
D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have
steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government's
plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 68.108.114.56
推 freemind99:D答案的意思應該是只是由某一帳戶移轉到政府設的帳戶中 11/06 09:57
→ freemind99:並沒有達成原來政府的目標:增加儲蓄率 所以反駁 11/06 09:58
→ freemind99:而B好像沒有像D一樣直接反駁goal 所以D較好 11/06 09:59
→ krisis:謝謝大大,了解了~ 11/06 14:54