: : Newspaper editorial:
: : In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on
: : criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been
: : to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses.
: : However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal,
: : since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses
: : committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.
: : Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
: : A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely
: : to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
: : B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the
: : general population.
: : C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not
: : already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
: : D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s
: : subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
: : E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing
: : people that something effective is being done about crime.
: 這題c沒問題
: A錯 =>A是說:不能上那些課的話就不可能防止那些會犯罪的人犯罪
: 反過來就是:要上課才可以防止犯罪 這沒有補充到題目可能產生的弱點
: C比較好 C提到這些參加課的人不是本來就在出獄後比較不會犯罪的
: 這個假設成立就可以讓題目沒有漏洞
: 相對A只是把題目論點再說一次而已
: 我是這麼覺得啦
我自己的解釋~
A的意思是說服刑期間無法進修大學課程的人不可能阻止他繼續犯罪。
取非,引伸-->在獄中有進修課程就未必會鎮壓住想犯罪的人~剛好反駁原意~~
C 取非,犯人有進修課程~ 在是放出來後會比其他犯人較少犯罪….支持原意~不成立
補習班是給A~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.104.60.241