推 Vinicks:(D)irrelevant 舉例其他大多數的美國城市並無法進一步說明 12/01 22:06
→ Vinicks:Middletown的情況 例:台灣"大多數人"都很有錢 能說全台灣 12/01 22:07
→ Vinicks:人都很錢嗎?? 當然不行嚕 像我就很窮= = 12/01 22:07
58. (33711-!-item-!-188;#058&007588)
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish.
There is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new officers, but not
the salaries of additional court and prison employees to process the
increased caseload of arrests and convictions that new officers usually
generate.
Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion
drawn above?
(A) Studies have shown that an increase in a city's police force does not
necessarily reduce crime.
(B) When one major city increased its police force by 19 percent last year,
there were 40 percent more arrests and 13 percent more convictions.
(C) If funding for the new police officers' salaries is approved, support for
other city services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year.
(D) In most United States cities, not all arrests result in convictions, and
not all convictions result in prison terms.
(E) Middletown's ratio of police officers to citizens has reached a level at
which an increase in the number of officers will have a deterrent effect on
crime.
Ans: E
我想問D為什麼不能當答案呢??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 123.193.145.194