[問題] PP1 CR#8

[pringless (pringles~*)]

The Highway Traffic Safety Institute reports that the PZ 1000 has the fewest
injuries per accident of any car in its class.  This shows that the PZ 1000
is one of the safest cars available today.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument in the
advertisement?

(A) The Highway Traffic Safety Institute report listed many cars in other
classes that had more injuries per accident than did the PZ 1000.

請問一下這題A為甚麼不能選？？

我的想法是  這題犯類比錯,某個等級裡最安全不代表現今所有車裡面最安全

所以A不就是說其他等級的車在每次accident的傷害比PZ1000多嗎？？

那為什麼不對？還是我的翻譯就錯了...

謝謝^^

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.168.39.94
※ 編輯: pringless       來自: 118.168.34.66        (01/05 10:54)
※ 編輯: pringless       來自: 118.168.34.66        (01/05 11:13)
推 StephenWan:(A)補充了其他class的車都更容易發生意外所以支持??
推 poison999:所以A support not weaken?
推 AKgOd:我覺得A應該是無關選項 題目說在PZ1000的class中~
→ AKgOd:A說 other class的車~
推 StephenWan:可是結論是說PZ1000是最安全的車之一(所有class)，而A
→ StephenWan:的答案剛好補充了原來題目中只有提到同款車是最安全的
→ StephenWan:所以我才想說應該是支持，大家在討論看看摟^^
推 iammarsman:個人覺得many改成all才支持歐
推 iammarsman:many是個籠統的字,比例多或少有可能形成支持或反駁