Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are
fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous
concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that
these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however,
recently discovered notes of Leibniz’ that discuss one of Newton’s
books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the
book includes a presentation of Newton’s calculus concepts
and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz’
own development of calculus concepts and techniques,
it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false.
A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however.
Leibniz’ notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book,
sections that precede the ones in which Newton’s calculus
concepts and techniques are presented.
A. The first provides evidence in support of the overall
position that the historian defends; the second is evidence
that has been used to support an opposing position.
B. The first provides evidence in support of the overall
position that the historian defends; the second is that position.
C. The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate
conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall
position that the historian defends;
the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion.
D. The first is evidence that has been used to support
a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is
evidence offered in support of the historian’s own position.
E. The first is evidence that has been used to support
a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is
further information that substantiates that evidence.
答案是D.
但Historian criticize的是"It has traditionally been thought
that these discoveries were independent"
第一個evidence不可能去支持這個說法！第一個evidence應該是用來支持Historian
的論點, 或是用來反對Historian所評論的論點.
有板友可以解釋答案為何選D嗎？
--
Que Pasa
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 88.0.232.72