推 kkara:我覺得(1)因no reason to suspect different=no different 04/13 01:23
→ yljazz:我也是這樣覺得 可是CD上看到又不是這樣... 04/14 20:46
想請教一下GWD-01-12閱讀:
關於環境退化導致鮭魚數量下降
其中Line 69-74有一段話:
there is no reason to suspect that the effect
would be qualitatively different
than what was seen in the aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption.
但我們沒理由懷疑這種效果和SH山噴發造成的後果有質的區別。
意思是
1)這種效果和SH山噴發是沒有質的區別
還是
2)這種效果和SH山噴發有質的區別
一直搞不太清楚
謝謝大大回答!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.4.234