推 curtis706:請問 not only 的倒裝，只會影響到create嗎? 06/30 00:36
→ curtis706:gave有需要也改成原形動詞give嗎? 06/30 00:36
the systematic clearing of forests in the United States
應該是有系統的砍樹 創造了農地 以及 提供了便宜的房子和家具
所以 create and gave 在句意上應該是要並列的
B的話 會變成 which 去代farmland 改變了句意
變成farmland 提供了便宜的房子和家具 句意不通
※ 引述《life2002 (dog days)》之銘言：
: 想請問各為高人 這題怎麼解釋??
: Q20:
: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United
: States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave
: consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it
: also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
: (A) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United
: States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave
: consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
: (B) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United
: States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave
: consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
: (C) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States,
: creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving
: consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
: (D) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created
: farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively
: inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
: (E) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not
: only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers
: relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it
: 當時我的想法是
: C不對 因為沒動辭
: D不對 沒有not only
: 然後那時候覺得應該是"farmland"給了consumer 不貴的房子跟家具
: 而不是the systematic clearing
: 所以選了B
: 而答案是A
: 我想問幾個問題
: (1)B不正確是因為缺了it嗎??是否還有其他原因?
: (2)not only...but also這個慣用語 also是否可以省略?
: (印象中有看過省略的)
: thanks!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.68.138.194
※ 編輯: scuhans 來自: 219.68.138.194 (06/30 00:29)
※ 編輯: scuhans 來自: 219.68.138.194 (06/30 00:36)