※ 引述《kenting15 (我不像我)》之銘言：
: 19. GWD-23-Q32
: Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed
: mosaics depicting several readily identifiable animal species: a hare, a
: partridge, and various Mediterranean fish. Oddly, most of the species
: represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were
: created. Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman
: cities, however, the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by
: traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman Empire.
: Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
: B. There is no single region to which all the species depicted in the
: Sepphoris mosaics are native.
: C. No motifs appear in the Sepphoris mosaics that do not also appear in the
: mosaics of some other Roman city.
: E. There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who
: lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar.
: 刪了兩個，剩下三個不知道如何判斷 答案是E
題幹的因果關係：
因：identical motifs in other cities,traveling artisans(create the mosaics)
---> 果：most of the species did not live in the S when mosaics were created
B: 與原題因果無關
C: 與原題因果無關，some other:是錯誤選項的長像
E: 取非後否定因，故正確
這題的關鍵字在那個traveling，因為有traveling的artisans，所以在S發現的mosaics才
有根本未在S生長的物種的形像
E的選項取非後告訴我們有一個common repertory of mosaic desighs是被住在不同地方的
artisans所熟悉的
所以根本不是因為有traveling artisan的關係
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.19.95.56
※ 編輯: wayshawn 來自: 218.19.95.56 (07/13 00:01)