推 lovekyoko:謝謝 07/14 15:20
其實本題在爭論一件事情
就是Tennessee warbler這種鳥數量下降的原因
Kate認為是棲息地減少造成
Scott認為是食物減少造成
題目問要如何推翻Scott的說法?
答案A
藉由提出另一種鳥數量也減少的現象
推翻Scott支持Kate
因為這種鳥食物沒短缺
但是棲息地和Tennessee warbler一樣減少
所以加強了棲息地減少造成鳥類數量下降的說法
(反駁食物量下降造成鳥類數量下降的說法)
也就是K和S吵架
題目想袒護誰
就找個偏袒該方的例子就成啦!
※ 引述《lovekyoko (匹茲堡的天空)》之銘言：
: GWD3-Q38:
: Kate: The recent decline in numbers of the Tennessee warbler, a North
: American songbird that migrates each fall to coffee plantations in South
: America, is due to the elimination of the dense tree cover that formerly was
: a feature of most South American coffee plantations.
: Scott: The population of the spruce budworm, the warbler’s favorite prey in
: North America, has been dropping. This is a more likely explanation of the
: warbler’s decline.
: Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls Scott’s hypothesis
: into question?
: A.The numbers of the Baltimore oriole, a songbird that dose not eat budworms
: but is as dependent on South American coffee plantations as is the Tennessee
: warbler, are declining.
: B.The spruce-budworm population has dropped because of a disease that can
: infect budworms but not Tennessee warblers.
: C.The drop in the population of the spruce budworm is expected to be only
: temporary.
: D.Many Tennessee warbler have begun migrating in the fall to places other
: than traditional coffee plantations.
: E.Although many North American songbirds have declined in numbers, no other
: species has experienced as great a decline as has the Tennessee warbler.
: 答案a
: Scott說 因為 budworms 下滑 所以吃他的warbler也下滑 要反駁這說法
: 請問A哪裡有反駁
: 我上CD看是說 這題是 異因同果的反駁
: 因為A說 oriole也下滑(同樣的果) 但是他不吃budworms(異因)
: 請問 這樣哪裡有反駁阿??? 感覺不出來
: 所以反駁的題型只要碰到選項有
: 異因同果 同因異果 都算反駁嗎???
: 謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.175.178.64