[語文] PP1-CR-23

[tremendous (keepgoing)]

From 1978 to 1988, beverage containers accounted for a steadily decreasing
percentage of the total weight of household garbage in the United States.
 The increasingly widespread practice of recycling aluminum and glass was
responsible for most of this decline.  However, although aluminum recycling
was more widely practiced in this period than glass recycling, it was found
that the weight of glass bottles in household garbage declined by a greater
percentage than the weight of aluminum cans.



Which of the following, if true of the United States in the period 1978 to
1988, most helps to account for the finding?



(A) Glass bottles are significantly heavier than aluminum cans of comparable
size.

(B) Recycled aluminum cans were almost all beverage containers, but a
significant fraction of the recycled glass bottles had contained products
other than beverages.

(C) Manufacturers replaced many glass bottles, but few aluminum cans, with
plastic containers.

(D) The total weight of glass bottles purchased by households increased at a
slightly faster rate than the total weight of aluminum cans.

(E) In many areas, glass bottles had to be sorted by color of the glass
before being recycled, whereas aluminum cans required no sorting.

答案為C

我知道其它選項為什麼錯，但不知道答案為什麼對

答案說製造商用塑膠容器取代了glass bottles，但很少aluminum cans被取代。
我不理解的是題目是玻璃和鋁二者之間的垃圾減少百分比在比較，
為什麼跑出一個塑膠容器也可以比較？
做題時一看到這個選項，馬上就用無關做刪除了 = ="

誰可以告訴我答案和原文的連結點啊~~~~~~感謝啦 ^+++^







--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 60.251.224.183
→ hohao:我認為主要意思是跟原來的比起來glass減少的比alumi多
→ hohao:(C)回收很多glass很少aluminum  所以glass減少的比較多
→ hohao:我是這樣想的啦  有錯請糾正
→ hohao:不好意思看錯了 應該是用塑膠取代很多glass很少alumi
推 Marie:題目是要找出為何玻璃沒有回收比較多 但也沒出現在垃圾中的
→ Marie:理由 所以塑膠取代玻璃是一個合理的新解釋 我是這樣想 XD