推 fshy:支持題不能看到無關議題(新名詞)就刪除. 很多正解都是對照組 09/14 21:39
→ fshy:即不同實驗得不同結果來支持本文 09/14 21:39
→ fshy:C答案只有講vaccine有virus.不能直接支持病是跟此virus有關 09/14 21:44
※ 引述《ttvliao (Vic)》之銘言：
: Although exposure to asbestos is the primary cause of mesothelioma, a
: slow-developing cancer, researchers believe that infection by the SV40
: virus is a contributing cause, since in the United States 60 percent of
: tissue samples from mesotheliomas, but none from healthy tissue, contain SV40.
: SV40 is a monkey virus; however, in 1960 some polio vaccine was
: contaminated with the virus. Researchers hypothesize that this vaccine
: was the source of the virus found in mesotheliomas decades later.
: Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the
: researchers' hypothesis?
: (A) SV40 is widely used as a research tool in cancer laboratories.
: (B) Changes in the technique of manufacturing the vaccine now prevent
: contamination with SV40.
: (C) Recently discovered samples of the vaccine dating from 1960 still
: show traces of the virus.
: (D) In a small percentage of cases of mesothelioma, there is no history
: of exposure to asbestos.
: (E) In Finland, where the polio vaccine was never contaminated, samples
: from mesotheliomas do not contain SV40.
: 答案(E)，小弟怎麼看都想不通，又要勞煩大大們相助了:)
話說(E)我一看到In Finland 就以無關類比把它先排除了
剩下的選項看來看去就屬(C)看似對原ressearcher' hypothesis提出有利證據,所以就選(C)了
想問問板上的NN們為什麼(C)不對呢?它不能算是提供了證據support hypothesis?
還有還有,像我有時候做題好像都會自以為無關就把正確的答案先排除掉了
有人也有正樣的問題嗎?應該怎麼改善哩???
--
如果驕傲沒被現實大海冷冷拍下 又怎會懂得要多努力才走得到遠方
如果夢想不曾墜落懸崖千鈞一髮 又怎會曉得執著的人擁有隱形翅膀
最初的夢想緊握在手上 最想要去的地方 怎麼能在半路就返航
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.130.192.208