作者lovelyvivian (persist)
看板GMAT
標題[語文] GWD-18-Q20(CR)
時間Tue Sep 22 14:39:54 2009
(Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the
Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development.) They plan to do this
by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-
conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the
highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders.
On the other hand, (these farmers will never actually sell any of the land,
provided that farming it remains viable.) But farming will not remain
viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the
financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why
a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to
modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the
following roles?
A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived;
the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be
attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
C. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained;
the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being
evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the
argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents
a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be
met in the foreseeable future.
答案是(D)
可以用排除法刪去
(A)ill-conceived;rejection
(B)cannot be attained;support the conclution
(E)endorses;
但是(C)要怎麼排除
還有(D)的整句話可能沒看懂,誰能幫忙解釋一下嗎?
P.S.每次做黑臉題,搞得我臉都黑了
--
如果驕傲沒被現實大海冷冷拍下 又怎會懂得要多努力才走得到遠方
如果夢想不曾墜落懸崖千鈞一髮 又怎會曉得執著的人擁有隱形翅膀
最初的夢想緊握在手上 最想要去的地方 怎麼能在半路就返航
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.130.192.208
推 fshy:(C)第ㄧ句原文並沒有提到該goal可以attain.原文只是批評原先 09/22 22:14
→ fshy:方法考慮不周. 然後提出第二個比較好的辦法. (C)第二句 09/22 22:15
→ fshy:disputing that conclusion好像也說不通. 相對D選項C比較不好 09/22 22:15
→ fshy:不過我承認這些都是事後知道答案試著解釋給自己聽的. 做黑臉 09/22 22:16
→ fshy:題我也是快轟了. 09/22 22:17