→ denizee3:這題有人可以幫一下嗎? 09/30 08:42
Often patients with ankle fractures that are stable, and thus do not require
surgery, are given follow-up x-ray because their orthopedists are concerned
about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture.
When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures
that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly.
Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture
initially judged stable.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A) Doctors who are general practitioners rather than orthopedists are less
likely than orthopedists to judge the stability of an ankle fracture
correctly.
B) Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by
the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.
C) X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several
hospitals were reviewed.
D) The healing of ankle fractures that have been surgically repaired is
always checked by means of a follow-up x-ray.
E) Orthopedists routinely order follow-up x-rays for fractures of bone other
than ankle bones.
Answer: C
我選B, 看了傷咖的文章可以了解B為什麼錯..
但是還是不能了解為什麼答案是C
是否可以請大家幫我解釋一下!
謝謝!
--
音樂史, 我永遠恨你..
(╯‵□′)╯︵ ┴─┴
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 68.122.146.33