作者pentimento (pentimento)
看板GMAT
標題Re: [問題] gwd 9-39
時間Wed Sep 30 12:36:47 2009
※ 引述《dukechiang (go go go)》之銘言:
: 不好意思 推文推過 不過想提供實例 這樣比較好理解
: 先重複推文內容
: D的the energy用的the限定的energy 所以最好要敘述一下
: 一下 the energy是哪裡的energy 是怎樣的energy
: 如果the energy in G是the energy consumed by G 而非
: 是produce 的energy 這樣一來 才能跟the energy p in F
: 兩者相比較
: 這題的D就是犯了over simplified的毛病
: 這有一個例子
: In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an
: average thirty-year-old male’s income; and forty-four percent in 1984.
: (A) income; and forty-four percent in 1984
: (B) income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent
: (C) income, and in 1984 forty-four percent
: (D) income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure
: (E) income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984
: ANS B
: 你可以看一下C為何不可以 道理是相同 1984年的44%並未說明是不是平均30歲男性的
: income的比例 這有可能 44%是三十歲女性or各種可能
原po Duke 大的解釋不錯,借文補充一下:
文法中「共通部分的省略」原則是:
一個句子若有兩個(以上)的共通部分時,可保留其一,省略另一個重
複的部分。
主要省略方式是「述部動詞共通部分的省略」
例一:He studied music in Vienna and (studied) painting in Paris.
他在維也納唸音樂,在巴黎學繪畫
例二:He was reading something but I don't know what (he was reading).
他在讀一些東西,但我不知道他唸的是什麼
例三:Mr. Brown teaches us mathematics and Mrs. Smith (teaches us)
English.
布朗老師教我們數學,史密斯老師教我們英語
重點是:以動詞為中心,可以向前向後,但是所省略的文字一定要完全一樣
(這與比較句型的省略不同),而且省略的文字要連續,不能跳躍。
所以,原題目答案 C 就不符規則。
: 就像"Yesterday I ate three apples, and today five."
: 這裡今天吃的五個頻果是昨天同一堆裡的APPLES 還是今天另外的新蘋果呢?
: 若句子改為Yesterday I ate three apples, and today I ate five of them.
: 那是不是很清楚可以看出是昨天同樣堆的蘋果呢?
: 參考看看吧!!
其次省略的方法是「其他共通部分的省略」
例四:I prefer live (performances) to recorded performances.
我喜歡現場表演勝於錄音表演
因此,以 Duke 大所提的例子,
Yesterday I ate three apples, and today five.
原來完整寫法應該是:
Yesterday I ate three apples, and today I eat five apples.
所以不能省略中間是因為「時態不一致」,另外省略文字有跳躍。但若改成
Yesterday I ate three apples, and today I eat five.
則可以。
至於 Duke 大所提的參考答案
Yesterday I ate three apples, and today I ate five of them.
個人有些看法:這個 them 是誰?是 apples 嗎?還是 three apples?
Yesterday I ate three apples, and today I ate five of APPLES.
Yesterday I ate three apples, and today I ate five of THREE APPLES.
好像兩句話都怪怪的。
以上,供參考
: ※ 引述《chenemily (天天保持好心情)》之銘言:
: : Over 75 percent of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power,
: : while in Germany it is just over 33 percent.
: : A.while in Germany it is just over 33 percent
: : B.compared to Germany, which uses just over 33 percent
: : C.whereas nuclear power accounts for just over 33 percent of the energy
: : produced in Germany
: : D.whereas just over 33 percent of the energy comes from nuclear power in
: : Germany
: : E.compared with the energy from nuclear power in Germany, where it is just
: : over 33 percent
: : 請問這題C&D該怎麼選比較好
: : 答案是C
: : 我覺得D的句子結構挺好的
: : 謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.23.25
推 dukechiang:現在看到才想到 我應該例句是要寫這樣 09/30 12:49
→ dukechiang:Yesterday I ate three apples in the basket, and 09/30 12:50
→ dukechiang:today five. 要了in the basket來限定apples 09/30 12:51
→ dukechiang:感謝提醒^^ 09/30 12:51