The following appeared in a letter from a part-owner of a small retail
clothing chain to her business partner:
“Commercial real estate prices have been rising steadily in the Sandida
Heights neighborhood for several years, while the prices in the adjacent
neighborhood of Palm Grove have remained the same. It seems obvious, then,
that a retail space in Sandida Heights must now be much more expensive than a
similar space in Palm Grove, which was not the case several years ago. So,
it appears that retail spaces in Sandida Heights are now overpriced relative
to those in Palm Grove. Therefore, it would be in our financial interest to
purchase a retail space in Palm Grove rather than in Sandida Heights.”）
請問一下這題Argument可以從哪些論點下去反駁呢?
謝謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 75.22.45.226