1.過去SH與PG鄰近地區的房價相似,不代表永遠都會一樣。
可能是SH有甚麼改變了...像是便利的交通網啊,居民福利提升等等...造成住屋
需求成長,價格也飆升
2.SH的房地產價格成長不見得就是overprice,要從供給及需求來衡量,搞不好以後會更高
3.即使SH的房地價格被高估了,也不能就說買PG的房子就好,說不定PG自己的價格才是被
高估咧,或是不買在SH也可以買在其他的地方,誰說一定要買PG
※ 引述《denizee3 (妮)》之銘言：
: The following appeared in a letter from a part-owner of a small retail
: clothing chain to her business partner:
: “Commercial real estate prices have been rising steadily in the Sandida
: Heights neighborhood for several years, while the prices in the adjacent
: neighborhood of Palm Grove have remained the same. It seems obvious, then,
: that a retail space in Sandida Heights must now be much more expensive than a
: similar space in Palm Grove, which was not the case several years ago. So,
: it appears that retail spaces in Sandida Heights are now overpriced relative
: to those in Palm Grove. Therefore, it would be in our financial interest to
: purchase a retail space in Palm Grove rather than in Sandida Heights.”）
: 請問一下這題Argument可以從哪些論點下去反駁呢?
: 謝謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 60.245.108.189