1.financial interest的考量很多，不能光憑real estate的價格，
如果S地房地產上升的原因是因為經濟起飛，P地則是經濟下降，
那麼即使一開始成本房地價格低，但之後的收益也低，這樣無法達到profit
2.只有告訴我們這兩個地區real estate，卻沒有告訴我們其他條件是不是都一樣，
例如人口結構、城市機能the function of the city、交通便利、經濟能力等等，
這樣很難論斷誰比較好
3.說不定S城市再漲也超不過P城市,題目中沒有告訴我們漲之前的價格
※ 引述《denizee3 (妮)》之銘言：
: The following appeared in a letter from a part-owner of a small retail
: clothing chain to her business partner:
: “Commercial real estate prices have been rising steadily in the Sandida
: Heights neighborhood for several years, while the prices in the adjacent
: neighborhood of Palm Grove have remained the same. It seems obvious, then,
: that a retail space in Sandida Heights must now be much more expensive than a
: similar space in Palm Grove, which was not the case several years ago. So,
: it appears that retail spaces in Sandida Heights are now overpriced relative
: to those in Palm Grove. Therefore, it would be in our financial interest to
: purchase a retail space in Palm Grove rather than in Sandida Heights.”）
: 請問一下這題Argument可以從哪些論點下去反駁呢?
: 謝謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 174.1.45.169
※ 編輯: Diablotin 來自: 174.1.45.169 (10/11 10:56)
※ 編輯: Diablotin 來自: 174.1.45.169 (10/11 22:22)