Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that
freedom would encourage Russians to multiply, but as a result of
dislocation and insecurity, the Russian population continues to dwindle
at the rate of 700,000 a year. The government proposes to address
the problem with a wide range of financial incentives, along with
investments in improved health care, road safety and the like.
These are positive measures, but they have been tried before,
to little avail. A better plan to reverse the population decline
is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the
private sphere. If a greater part of the population participated in
important decisions and shared in the country's wealth, then larger
families would result. In addition, if corruption and greed among
the elite were curbed, public health would improve and average
life expectancy would increase.
The two boldfaced statements serve what function in the argument above?
A.The first is the main point of the analyst's argument; the second
is a premise that supports the the first.
B.The first is a premise that undermines an alternative to the
analyst's proposal; the second is a premise that supports the
analyst's main claim.
C.The first is a premise that contradicts the main point made by
the analyst; the second is the main point of the argument.
D.The first is a premise that supports a proposal; the second is
that proposal.
E.The first is a conclusion that the argument endorses; the second
is a premise that opposes that conclusion.
ans:B
不懂他哪裡undermines an alternative to the analyst's proposal
能理解他undermines 政府的proposal...
還是我哪裡沒看懂@@
有哪位大大能幫我解答一下嗎QQ 感恩
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 60.251.147.208
※ 編輯: musiclife729 來自: 60.251.147.208 (11/28 20:39)