Re: [語文] GWD-1-16

[tootoobenee (A級垂耳兔)]

※ 引述《glendy (glendy)》之銘言：
: 第16題
: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending
: in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it
:                                       ----------------------------
: was in any previous election.
: ---
: 答案是Ｂ：
: a greater proportion than
: 但我選C：
: a greater proportion than they have been
: 是否they have been是多餘的字眼？或有其他原因？

這題是走同位語的獨立主格結構, 還原句為
a proportion (that was) greater than it was in any previous election
a proportion是以同位語方式修飾half of the spending
省略後因為be動詞that was的was消失了,所以後面than的主詞及be動詞也跟著省略
這樣比較結構才會平衡

一點淺見...

--

A兔GMAT作戰中心

http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/tootoo5478/

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.25.224.248
推 pentimento:這題應該不是這樣解的。依照上述，結果並不是 (B)。
→ pentimento:個人建議的解法，請看下篇。
※ 編輯: tootoobenee     來自: 114.25.224.248       (12/02 01:24)