Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites,including those
that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.However ,since there are
several winemakers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce ,people
who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfits can drink wines
produced by these winemakers without risking an allergic reaction to
sulfites.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) these winemakers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect
produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any
potentially allergenic substances to their wine.
(B) Not all forms of sulfit are equally likely to produce the allergic rection.
(C) Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.
(D) Apart from sulfites,there are no substances commonly present in wine that
give rise to an allergic reaction.
(E) Sulfites are not naturally presentin the wines produced by these winemakers
in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks
these wines.
我覺得很疑惑的是題目已經說不加S了，為什麼答案E還講S的濃度？
我反而認為D是對的，除了S酒裡沒有其他的東西會引起過敏
（所以 那些人就可以喝了）
有沒有人可以告訴我問題在哪
怎麼想都不覺得E是對的
謝謝囉~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 125.224.78.157