推 Gian:謝謝你 我大概懂了~ 01/02 15:54
※ 引述《Gian (真希望有進展...)》之銘言：
: Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites,including those
: that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.However ,since there are
: several winemakers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce ,
people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfits can drink wines
produced by these winemakers without (risking an allergic reaction to
sulfites.)
: Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(D) Apart from sulfites,there are no substances commonly present in wine that
give rise to an allergic reaction.
(E) Sulfites are not naturally presentin the wines produced by these winemakers
in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks
these wines.
: 我覺得很疑惑的是題目已經說不加S了，為什麼答案E還講S的濃度？
: 我反而認為D是對的，除了S酒裡沒有其他的東西會引起過敏
: （所以 那些人就可以喝了）
: 有沒有人可以告訴我問題在哪
: 怎麼想都不覺得E是對的
: 謝謝囉~
小弟不才 試著回答這一題
首先題目的結論是 "對S有過敏的人喝了酒商的酒 不會有(對S過敏的風險)"
抱歉我不會標顏色 所以我用()把我要表達的重點 在中英文中標示出來
根據()的內容 D應該是無關選項
因為題目問的是對S的過敏 而不是其他東西的過敏
再來 E選項的重點在於 naturally present in
雖然酒商保證不加了 可是有沒有可能在釀酒的過程中
因為發酵而產生了S這個物質 如果有 那儘管酒商保證不加
對飲用者來說 還是會有對S過敏的風險
而E選項是把上述的風險給排除掉
有錯 請用力更正 謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.81.150.233
※ 編輯: horndenny 來自: 219.81.150.233 (01/01 17:29)