→ ilovemozart:two boldfaced portions在哪裡？ 我感覺看不到ㄝ 04/10 19:11
※ 編輯: halaphone 來自: 114.42.95.244 (04/10 22:57)
In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash
injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such
injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not
covered. Presently, no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that
spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identied. Nevertheless,
these facts do not warrant the conclusion drawn by some commentators that in
the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of
the reported cases are spurious. Clearly, in countries where automobile
insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little
incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following
roles?
(A) The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion
that has been based on that claim.
(B) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the
argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.
(C) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which
the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
(D) The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the
second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding.
(E) The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the
second is evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.
Ans: D
這一題怎麼解呀!!我已經看了快半個小時了，我還是想不出來為什麼要選D
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.42.95.244