推 kernnel:>_< 感激不盡 我開始刪除掉我這個判斷點了 09/11 00:00
推 DreamKite:這個判題點還算不錯,等到無路可走再使用 09/11 00:05
Google這篇文章第一句話，就可以搜到這題在Manhattan論壇的解釋。
也有人問過跟你一樣的問題，RonPurewal的說明，很值得參考。
<< on official problems, CORRECT ANSWERS ARE CORRECT.
the only way you can approach these things effectively is to say
"oh, ok, i didn't know you could do that"
and then add the example to your mental repository.
since the question is official, it's a complete waste of your time to
continue doubting it after you've verified that it's the OA. >>
就別把and so 當作判題點吧，應該有更明顯的結構性錯誤存在在別的選項。
※ 引述《kernnel (沒有你的日記)》之銘言：
: 95. (29661-!-item-!-188;#058&003962)
: Unlike frogs that metamorphose from tadpoles into adults within
: a one-year period, it takes three to four years for the mountain
: yellow-legged frog of the Sierra Nevada to reach adulthood, and so
: they are restricted to deeper bodies of water that do not dry up
: in summer or freeze solid in winter.
: (E) mountain yellow-legged frogs of the Sierra Nevada take three to four
: years to reach adulthood, and so they are
: 想請問兩個連接詞(and so)連用 S+V+O and so S+V+O
: 這樣是否有redundancy?
: 記得不知道在哪裡看過說這樣文法是錯誤的 但是PP1-95這題答案卻是(E)
: 謝謝>_<
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 123.204.58.105
※ 編輯: Belagua 來自: 123.204.58.105 (09/10 22:24)