[SC. ] and also => redundant or not???

[kernnel (沒有你的日記)]

常常看到and also 出現在所有錯誤選項中
只有一次看到and also是出現在正確選項(抱歉忘了是在哪裡看到的)

聽過很多人都說and also有redundancy的味道
不過今天剛好在曼哈頓論壇看到這個討論
Ron正式釐清了and also並沒有redundent
看來以後and also不能當作一個刪除的考點了  @_@傻眼


there's nothing redundant about "and also".

"and also" is redundant if it appears in the same sentence as "both";
this may be what you're thinking about.

i.e.,
X and also Y --> totally fine
both X and also Y --> redundant (and therefore incorrect)

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/the-organic-food-industry-t6929.html


--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 140.112.4.191
推 tsai18:若是時間緊迫之下還是可以拿出此招來刪除