推 weiwei1117:我想是因為題幹已經說有很多錢存在特別帳戶裡面了 04/28 18:56
→ weiwei1117:故要削弱的地方應該是要指出民眾不是為了節稅而存入 04/28 18:57
→ weiwei1117:而不是說民眾沒有意願把錢存入特別帳戶 04/28 18:59
推 weiwei1117:應該是說民眾不是為了節稅而存入更多的錢 04/28 19:02
→ maitri:謝謝 04/28 19:48
GWD6-Q20:
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to
increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government
introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved
with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account
holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated
in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the
money they had invested in the special accounts.
B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts
that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special
savings accounts introduced by the government.
C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings
accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been
transferring those savings into the special accounts.
E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been
successful criticized it when it was introduced.
重點是欲設特別帳戶以增加存款，我有疑問的是B、D選項。
照Ｂ的敘述，市民就沒有誘因在特別帳戶存款，存款也不會增加。
照Ｄ的敘述，僅轉移帳戶而非增加存款。
答案是Ｄ，但是Ｂ看起來也很合理，想請問錯在哪？
謝謝。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.137.24.248